Wednesday, November 28, 2007

History Channel "Show" On Bigfoot, November 28th


Noted the History Channel information about their series, Monsterquest: "From Bigfoot to Swamp Beast, Monsterquest reveals the truth of legendary monster sightings around the world. Deploying the latest in hi-tech equipment, each episode scientifically examines the best evidence available, from pictures and video, to hair and bones, as well as the eyewitness accounts themselves. From pilots to policemen to ship captains, a number of seemingly credible people have seen things they can't explain. One part history, one part science and one part monsters, MonsterQuest discovers the truth behind these legendary monsters."

Like you, I watched this monstrosity disguised as a documentary on our favorite topic, Bigfoot. It was a huge disappointment in my opinion as you really didn't learn anything about the subject matter, just the same old song and dance. Their experts on the P-G Bigfoot film, Owen Caddy and Dr. Daris Swindler... since when, I should ask? Why didn't they interview Chris Murphy, John Green or M.K. Davis to discuss the nuts and bolts of this movie? Murphy, Green and Davis really have a handle on the P-G film. And the producer, Doug Hajicek, whom I met in 2003, did a major disservice to a trusting American television audience by stating, and more than once, that what was being studied was the ORIGINAL Patterson-Gimlin Bigfoot film, when in fact that is not so. They were working with a copy and the whereabouts of the ORIGINAL movie footage is still in question. You, the trusting viewer, were deceived and mislead.

Or, maybe I am wrong. Perhaps the lawyers would liken it to something like this: that was just using a liberal license in filmmaking.

Yet the aforementioned Monsterquest teaser tells us, and I quote: "Monsterquest reveals the truth of legendary monster sightings around the world." Yet somehow you were lied to about the most celebrated film footage of the legendary Bigfoot, the Patterson-Gimlin film. So it begs the question: what else did they tell you that wasn't on the level.

Don't get me wrong. I like Doug Hajicek and his continued involvment in Bigfoot films but perhaps in the future he should take greater care in crossing his Ts and dotting his Is and tell his viewer the REAL TRUTH.



Saturday, November 24, 2007

Editor Perez At Home


Daniel Perez seen in front of his home with his dog, Pre (after Steve Prefontaine), on Thanksgiving Day, 2007.



Sunday, November 18, 2007

ANOTHER BIGFOOT SCULPTURE



Bigfooter David Murphy has also given us permission to sell copies of his statue on this site. They are only sold to customers in the United States. Cost postpaid: $34.94. You can have them made in their natural color (shown here) or painted. Statue is about 12" inches tall and also makes a good talking point when it comes to our big hairy friend. Own a copy today. Click on the image for a more engrossing view of this simply beautiful piece of artwork. Christmas is around the corner...maybe this might be the hot ticket for that special someone in your life who is fanatic about Bigfoot. Order today so your product can be shipped way before December 25th.



EXCLUSIVE: ROGER PATTERSON ARTWORK



During the course of the late Roger Patterson's life, his artistic hands created the following sculpture, called "BigFoot," by Roger. You can own a copy of this historic piece today. Only $29.95, which includes postage. (For now, only copies will be sold in the United States). You can specify whether you want your cast in its natural color (shown here) or painted at the time of your order. We are the only site with official authorization to sell these bust with permission from Patricia Patterson herself. All proceeds go to Pat Patterson. Hurry, they will be up on this site for a limited time, possibly throught the end of November. Makes an excellent Christmas present for your loved ones! Just click on the image for a larger view.



Thursday, November 15, 2007

BIGFOOT TIMES, NOVEMBER 2007 RELEASED!


This month's issue of the Bigfoot Times has gone out in the mail to all our subscribers scattered to the four corners of the globe. It was released November 15th. Should you wish to get the .pdf version, you must e-mail the editor and request such. Noted Tom Yamarone of this current edition: "GREAT JOB with the newsletter...of course, I've only read the first page and a half about the celebration! Fantastic! I like how you capture the spirit of the event and acknowledge the highlights, while summarizing it in a concise manner." We had a write up of the October 20th meet in Willow Creek, California to celebrate the 40th anniversary of Roger Patterson's famous Bigfoot film. Noted the latest newsletter: "Joyce kearney left a message on my phone, probably early Octoer and my work..." Subscribe and find out more. For only $12 per year you can't go wrong. Here I am at my booth in the VFW Hall in Willow Creek, California on October 20, 2007. Photograph courtesy and copyright Tom Yamarone, 2007

Enjoy,

Daniel Perez,
editor/publisher: Bigfoot Times



SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, DECEMBER 2007


FINALLY, SOME RESPECT FROM A WELL KNOWN PUBLICATION. A THANK YOU TO DR. JEFF MELDRUM FOR PASSING ALONG THIS INFORMATION. READ ON...

Insights: Bigfoot Anatomy; December 2007; Scientific American Magazine; by Marguerite Holloway; 2 Page(s)
One overcast Sunday morning in 1996, Jeffrey Meldrum and his brother drove to Walla Walla, Wash., to see if they could find Paul Freeman, a man renowned in Bigfoot circles as a source of footprint casts. Meldrum--who has followed Bigfoot lore since he was a boy--had heard that Freeman was a hoaxer, "so I was very dubious," he recalls. The brothers arrived unannounced, Meldrum says, and chatted with Freeman about his collection. Freeman said he had found tracks just that morning, but they were not good, not worth casting. The brothers wanted to see them regardless. "I thought we could use this to study the anatomy of a hoax," Meldrum says. Instead Meldrum's visit to a ridge in the Blue Mountains set him firmly on a quest he has been on since.
Meldrum, an associate professor of anatomy and anthropology at Idaho State University, is an expert on foot morphology and locomotion in monkeys, apes and hominids. He has studied the evolution of bipedalism and edited From Biped to Strider (Springer, 2004), a well-respected textbook. He brought his anatomical expertise to the site outside Walla Walla. The 14-inch-long prints Freeman showed him were interesting, Meldrum says, because some turned out at a 45-degree angle, suggesting that whatever made them had looked back over its shoulder. Some showed skin whorls, some were flat with distinct anatomical detail, others were of running feet-imprints of the front part of the foot only, of toes gripping the mud. Meldrum made casts and decided it would be hard to hoax the running footprints, "unless you had some device, some cable-loaded flexible toes."



Monday, November 12, 2007

Bigfoot Times Editor at Work!


This shot by Mrs. Patti S. Reinhold in May 2005 in Bellingham, Washington at a Bigfoot conference. Courtesy and copyright by Patti S. Reinhold.



Friday, November 09, 2007

MONSTER QUEST


DID HISTORY CHANNEL FIND BIG FOOT?
'MONSTERQUEST' ON HUNT FOR SASQUATCH
By MELISSA JANE KRONFELD

An animated Sasquatch

November 9, 2007 -- THE History Channel may have discovered the missing link.
In its new show "MonsterQuest," an adventurous group braved the wilderness to see if "Big Foot" actually lives in Ontario, Canada.
Scientists Kurt Nelson and Jeff Meldrum spent five days with a video and audio crew at a cabin in the utterly remote Snelgrove Lake, pulling DNA samples from the trap and exploring the forest.
The show has caused a stir among enthusiasts because it has gotten so close to proving the Sasquatch monster may, in fact, exist.
The show made "contact" with the thing on its last night of filming.
"A stone was thrown at about 2 a.m.," executive producer Doug Hajibeck told The Post. "That stone hit like a bullet. It was thrown with amazing accuracy."
The crew threw a stone back and, in a matter of minutes, a second stone was launched at them.
"I was really scared, and I felt the adrenaline," said Hajibeck. "When we threw that rock into the woods and then it got sent back, my heart raced."
Blood, tissue and hair discovered later on a bear trap outside the cabin was tested.
The hair did not match any known North American bear or animal and tests showed an uncanny similarity to human DNA with one exception: the irregular DNA matched that of a primate.
"It is a show that presents and analyzes the evidence," said executive producer Mike Stiller. "But, ultimately, it's up the viewers."
The episode re-airs tonight at 11 on History Channel.



Tuesday, November 06, 2007

"BIG DAY FOR BIGFOOT BELIEVERS"

REDDING, CALIFORNIA RECORD SEARCHLIGHT, OCTOBER 20, 2007

Big day for Bigfoot believers

Famous film of alleged beast seen in north state turns 40

By Dylan Darling (Contact)
Saturday, October 20, 2007


No, Bigfoot is as real as the Great Pumpkin.

I don't care, but wouldn't mind finding one.

It's shaky, famous and was filmed in the north state 40 years ago today.

Some say the Patterson-Gimlin film proves the existence of the legendary Bigfoot.

Others say it's an elaborate hoax and had to be a guy in a hairy suit.

You might not recognize the names, but you've likely seen the footage. A massive, furry biped -- perhaps Bigfoot -- lumbers along the bank of Bluff Creek near where the Trinity and Klamath rivers collide, turning back to glance toward the nervously held 16-mm camera.

While the film runs only about a minute, its effect on the debate over Bigfoot's existence has been lasting.

"It's longer and clearer than anything else," said John Green, a former Canadian newspaper publisher who has been trying to track down Bigfoot since 1957.

Green is familiar with just about every piece of alleged Bigfoot film, photo and plaster that has surfaced in the past half-century. He has a collection of 4,000 reports, detailing when and where people say they saw the big animal.

The best evidence out there still is the film, he said.

The film was shot by Roger Patterson who was trying to get footage of fresh Bigfoot tracks for a documentary, Green said. Robert Gimlin was along for the adventure into the north state backcountry.

Recent tracks had been found near Bluff Creek, which drew Patterson and Gimlin for an expedition, said Jeffery Meldrum, associate professor of anatomy and anthropology at Idaho State University in Pocatello, Idaho. The duo didn't find Bigfoot right away.

"They'd been putting in their time in the saddle for a couple of weeks," he said.

Exploring the rugged terrain on horseback, the pair saw a massive, hairy figure on the afternoon of Oct. 20, 1967.

The film is shaky because Patterson is running with the camera in hand after hastily dismounting and digging his camera out of his saddlebag. As he gets close, the beast looks back over its shoulder and shoots a stare right at Patterson.

He later described the stare to Green.

"You know the look when an umpire says, 'One more word and you're out of the game'?" Green said.

Shown in movie houses around the U.S. and Canada shortly after it was shot and now a part of several Bigfoot documentaries, the film has been at the epicenter of the Bigfoot debate for decades -- believers say it's proof and doubters say it's a sham. Despite 40 years of scrutiny, the film, unlike many others said to be of Bigfoot, hasn't been proved to be a hoax.

Patterson died of Hodgkin's disease in 1972, so Gimlin has been alone in recounting of what happened that day. Tired of taking grief over whether the film was real or not, he often turns down interview requests, although he started speaking at Bigfoot conferences in recent years.

A woman who answered Gimlin's phone said he didn't do interviews, although she agreed Thursday to pass him a message. He didn't call back.

Patricia Patterson, Robert Patterson's widow, also declined an interview request. She owns the rights to the film, but declined to give permission for use on Redding.com.

Rights for still photos from the film are owned by Erik Dahinden, a Canadian whose late father also sought Bigfoot and obtained the rights in a court decision. He said he would allow use of the photo only for a price.

Gimlin has spoken to Meldrum about his experience. He told him that he got a closer look at the beast than Patterson because he wasn't looking through a viewfinder.

"He was impressed with what he saw," Meldrum said. "The musculature. The naturalness of its gait. He was confident what he saw was a real animal."

Scientists who have vetted the film note the movement in the animal's joints and length of its bone structure that Green says show it is too big to be a man.

"It is simply not built like a human," Green said.

The footage also appears to show an animal with breasts, leading researchers to say that it was probably a female Bigfoot.

Among the believers in the film is Brian Campbell of Redding, who says he has gone on expeditions into the deepest north state woods in search of the creature since he saw one near Lassen Peak as a teenager in the 1970s.

He said the animal in the film is the same as what he saw in the woods.

"That's a real Sasquatch," Campbell said. "That's a real Bigfoot, definitely."

Reporter Dylan Darling can be reached at 225-8266 or at ddarling@redding.com.



Sunday, November 04, 2007

"Bigfoot Big Shot"

10:00 PM PDT on Saturday, November 3, 2007
By GREGOR McGAVIN
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA, PRESS-ENTERPRISE (NEWSPAPER COPY RELEASED NOVEMBER 4, 2007)
PHOTOGRAPHS COPYRIGHT THE PRESS-ENTERPRISE, TAKEN BY PHOTOGRAPHER CAITLIN M. KELLY.
Daniel Perez lives in a tidy, two-story home on a quiet Riverside side street, far from the deep, dark backwoods where his real interest walks.

Or doesn't, depending on what you believe.

By day, Perez toils as a licensed union electrician. But his life's work is as a dogged researcher and investigator, hot on the hard-to-follow trail of Bigfoot.

Story continues below

Caitlin M. Kelly / The Press-Enterprise
Riverside resident Daniel Perez says he believes there may be more than 100,000 of the Bigfoot creatures in North America today but concedes that any such figure is a "guesstimate" at best. The creatures are also known as Sasquatch.
"It's an ongoing investigation," says Perez, 44, who has spent more than 20 years in his pursuit of the legendary creature.

Perez is editor and publisher of the monthly print and online newsletter Bigfoot Times and co-founder of the Center for Bigfoot Studies, both of which he operates from an upstairs study at his home that is packed with files and artifacts.

He is quoted widely in articles and books on Sasquatch, as the hirsute biped is more commonly known in Canada. He even coined some of the phrases that became part of the Bigfoot lexicon, including the term "Bigfooter" to describe devotees.

But perhaps Perez's biggest claim to Bigfoot fame is as an expert on what is known in Sasquatch circles as "the Patterson-Gimlin film."

The roughly minute-long 16-millimeter film was shot at Bluff Creek in Northern California in 1967. The film -- in which a large, hairy creature turns to face the camera before striding off into the woods -- is the most well-known footage and is upheld by many as proof of Bigfoot's existence.

Perez's booklet on the film, "Bigfoot at Bluff Creek," is often cited as the "bible" on the subject.

On Oct. 20, he served as keynote speaker at a conference in Willow Creek, celebrating the 40th anniversary of the filming by Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin.

"Daniel is a very dogged investigative researcher," said Jeffrey Meldrum, an associate professor of anatomy and anthropology at Idaho State University. Meldrum has written extensively on the evolution of primates and authored a recent book on Sasquatch.

"His forte is a penchant for detail. In his investigations he leaves very few loose ends."

So how does a well-respected Bigfoot expert come to live in the Inland area, not exactly a hotbed of Sasquatch sightings?

It started with a movie, Perez says.

He was 10 when he first watched "The Legend of Boggy Creek," a documentary-style movie about a Bigfoot-like creature.

'Just Became Hooked'

"I just became hooked," says Perez, a wiry fellow with long, black hair under a Bigfoot Times baseball cap. "I never grew out of it."

Perez, who dropped out after a few months at Humboldt State University, is a self-taught researcher.

He has spent more than two decades researching the creature and investigating purported sightings.

Story continues below

He has journeyed to sites of Bigfoot spottings throughout the Pacific Northwest, in Georgia and Ohio and as far afield as Australia.

Perez has debunked false claims and defended what he believes to be solid evidence.

But he has never seen Bigfoot himself.

The closest Perez has come to a sighting are two tracks he found -- the first in Hemet in 1980 and the second near Mt. Whitney a few years later.

Perez came across the Hemet tracks after he responded to reports of Bigfoot sightings in the area. In the woods near a creek, he found a 17-inch footprint.

"That was the first track I saw, and I was like, 'It's real!' " he said.

Since then, Perez has corresponded regularly with other researchers and with Bigfoot buffs.

Bigfoot Expertise

In his study, two metal filing cabinets are filled with newspaper clippings, photographs and artifacts. Three bookshelves brim with texts on Bigfoot, cryptozoology and other topics. Plaster casts of Sasquatch and its footprints abound, and photos of Perez with notable researchers are alongside family pictures.

Perez acknowledges that little is known about Bigfoot, despite decades of reported sightings and research.

He says he believes the creatures may have come to North America via a prehistoric ice bridge. They might be descendants of a giant ape that once roamed throughout Asia.

Perez believes Bigfoot is a nocturnal creature that shuns contact with humans.

He believes there may be more than 100,000 of the creatures in North America today but concedes that any such figure is a "guesstimate" at best.

Perez takes heart, however, in the fact that skeptics have been unable, despite several attempts, to successfully duplicate the footage from the Patterson-Gimlin film using a man in a monkey suit as the subject.

He says he will continue on the trail of Bigfoot, investigating incidents such as the photographs shot in September by a hunter in the woods of Pennsylvania that some Bigfooters say could depict a young Sasquatch.

And Perez holds out hope that one day, he will have his own sighting.

"I think about it all the time," he said.



Friday, November 02, 2007

New Book On Bigfoot

This according to George Eberhart: "I hear that University of Chicago Press will be publishing a Bigfoot book next year in the Fall. It’s called Bigfoot, and is written by Joshua Blue Buhs.

All I could find quickly online about him is:

Joshua Blu Buhs is an independent scholar living in California. He received his doctorate from the University of Pennsylvania's History and Sociology of Science Department in 2001. The Fire Ant Wars was his first book. Currently, he is working on a cultural history of the legendary sasquatch. He is married and has a daughter."

Thanks to George for this information.



Dr. Jeff Meldrum's Technical Paper On Tracks


Dr. Jeff Meldrum has produced an excellent monograph published by the New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bullentin, 42, 2007. Definitely worth reading. Dr. Meldrum can be e-mailed at: jeff.meldrum@gmail.com



Baby Bigfoot On MSNBC...



Thursday, November 01, 2007

Coverage of the 40th Anniversary of the P-G Film

Road to Bluff Creek
With the faithful on the Sasquatch stations of the cross

Story and photo
by Steven Streufert

Conference presenter Daniel Perez critiques the professional skeptics at Fortean Times magazine.



“Roger and Bob rode out that day/Their lives changed in every way/So did ours ’cause we got to see/A living Bigfoot, walking tall and free,” sang Tom Yamarone, belting out the verses of one of his Bigfoot folk-historical ballads.

Yamarone’s lyrics rang true inside the Willow Creek VFW Hall a couple of weekends ago, where 50 or so members of the Sasquatch community gathered to celebrate the 40th anniversary of the fabled “Patterson-Gimlin film.” The film, shot by the “Roger and Bob” of Yamarone’s song, is the most solid Bigfoot evidence ever presented. (See “Bigfoot Trapped By Norcal Fanatic!” Oct. 18.)

Believers from near and far made the pilgrimage on Oct. 20 — first to Willow Creek, and then out to the remote site where the film was shot, there to pay their respects to the historic event and to share the latest research.

A shimmer of possibility filled the VFW Hall. Bigfooting, it seems, is as much about the community of ’Squatchers as it is about the Giant Hairy Ape itself.Something had changed these folks who, despite otherwise ordinary lives, were ready to pursue to the ends of the Earth a creature most consider a phantasm. Curiosity and the spirit of rational inquiry were readily apparent, noted in thorough documentation covering the walls. Noting no sign of lunacy, it occurred to me that the crazy ones were the journalists sitting in their barren offices cranking out the same old dismissals.

Daniel Perez, authority on logistics of the making of the Patterson-Gimlin film, argued that the subject could not have been faked. That muscle mass moving with each huge stride, the height and inhuman proportions — could that have been produced with padding and fake fur? The strides through the film site of a 6’4” man reveal his tiny homo sapiens form beside a creature that could smash him with one stomp. (“If the suit doesn’t fit, he must exist.”)

No one has been able to replicate the film, even with a $75,000 BBC budget. Perez presented a 16mm Kodak Cine-100 home movie camera, the model that Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin used. I felt its awkward bulk and saw the creature on the projection screen through its tiny, dim viewfinder. How anything was captured by this camera with its tiny 16 mm cartridge is miracle enough.

Legendary Al Hodgson, for decades the operator of the general store, also spoke. He was a contact not only for the Patterson-Gimlin film but also the 1958 activity in the area, when tractor driver Jerry Crew brought giant footprint casts down from the Bluff Creek road construction zone and made front page news in the Times-Standard and papers globally. This was the birth of “Bigfoot” as a media phenomenon. Presenting the recent North Coast Journal with its cover’s tabloid parody, Hodgson said: “You may have seen this — don’t like it.” Chuckles and groans emerged. Bigfoot was not a joke to this crowd.

Hodgson presented tales told to him by locals, without even a hint of the tall tale in the telling from this 83-year-old church-going business and family man. Of one of his informants, Al said, “He is not lying — know him too well.” Hodgson saw sightings as ordinary. The Sasquatch is a consistently documented though elusive primate, the origin of old frontier tales and centuries-old Native cultural representations. Without seeking it out, people see it, hear its howls and vocalizations, find footprints or feel its wild, cunning eyes gazing from hillsides that could hide just about anything.

Cliff Barackman spoke lovingly of his “foot fetish,” with evidence that footprints found in 1958 appear to have been made by the same individual in the 1967 film (as confirmed by Idaho State anatomist and physical anthropologist Jeff Meldrum). Scott McClean traced the history of newspaper reporting going back to the 1840s, predating the birth of hoaxer claimants like Bluff Creek road contractor Ray Wallace by nearly a century. David Murphy outlined the biography of Roger Patterson — author, filmmaker, cowboy, acrobat and inventor. Humboldt’s James “Bobo” Fay completed the round with tales of early 1940s Bluff Creek bigfooter Irwin Supple. The event concluded with a convivial champagne toast to Roger and Bob. Then plans for a convoy into the mysterious hills to the north were made.

The miles upon miles of real wilderness in the Six Rivers National Forest, accessed by hellish boulder-strewn and mud-laden dirt roads to the middle of nowhere, embody the wild mystery. The high-speed night trip led by Bobo, who seems to treat these mountains like his local neighborhood, was a soul-wrenching experience in itself. My little VW started bottom-grinding in thick snow at about 4,000 feet. After two hours of nasty tree-dodging, slippery hell, we crossed the 1958 bridge and entered Louse Camp, down on Bluff Creek. This was a place of history, where the 1959-1962 Pacific Northwest Expedition had set up digs. Bustling with activity and a roaring campfire, a keg of Bluff Creek Ale (note the Bigfoot on the label) was already tapped. A call-blasting speaker system and high-tech thermal imaging gear was out.

Later I walked with Bobo down the road illuminated by the white thermal viewer’s glow as we sought forms in the dark. His group had seen Sasquatch activity in the last few months just a few yards away. With sentries staked out in turns on the hillside, the campfire devolved into folk songs and Bigfoot tales. I was up until 4 a.m. discussing the paranormal and psychic aspects of the phenomenon, multi-dimensionality and string theory with sometime paranormalist author and field researcher Thom Powell. A schoolteacher and logical man, he brought up Occam’s Razor — the idea that the simplest answer is often the best one. Actually, the existence of a Bigfoot creature explains it all with more facility than hoaxing or hallucination.

The next day, descending about 2,000 near-vertical feet to the creek below, we made our way to the film site. Soon we found ourselves gazing upon what looked like footprints only 30 yards from our vehicles. Stunned, I immediately felt the energy of conversion starting to overcome me. One print in shallow moss and mud measured 22 inches. Toe shapes were visible. Preceding this in a patch of moss was another browned and deadened area, foot-shaped. The step between them was six feet, about double that of the average human.

Researcher Scott McClean calmly got out his ruler and measured the particulars, took a quick photo, and moved on. I stood stunned. Could it be real? It’s inconclusive, he said; a “blobsquatch,” is all. That’s just squatch-on-the-brain, he said. What we need is real, provable evidence.

With the Weekly World News defunct, can Bigfoot at last roam freely into our unbiased awareness? There is more evidence for Sasquatch, tangible and scientific, than there is for God, the Devil, reincarnation or the soul. One doesn’t catch fleeting glimpses of Babe the Blue Ox. Sasquatchers are in search of the last mystery of the wild American land, the living embodiment of the fact that humans are not the central meaning of the earth, nor in complete knowledge or domination of it.

Asking about my angle on this story, McClean said, “Just don’t use that word, ‘believe.’” It is not, he said, a matter of faith, but of fact — it is out there. Hoaxes and hallucinations do occur, but the time has come for us to consider that perhaps there is more to the natural world than dreamed of in our philosophies. These guys are living it.



Full disclosure — Steven Streufert is the owner of Willow Creek’s Bigfoot Books.

TOP

COVER STORY | IN THE NEWS | DIRT
POEM | IN REVIEW | GARLICK'S NOTEBOOK | MOVIES
TALK OF THE TABLE | THE HUM | CALENDAR

Comments? Write a letter!



© Copyright 2007, North Coast Journal, Inc.NEWS-bigfoot-exposed.jpg



Juvenile Bigfoot in Pennsylvannia?

Pa. hunter's images stir Bigfoot debate
Sun Oct 28, 3:16 PM ET
It's furry and walks on all fours. Beyond that, about the only thing certain about the critter photographed by a hunter's camera is that some people have gotten the notion it could be a Sasquatch, or bigfoot. Others say it's just a bear with a bad skin infection.

Rick Jacobs says he got the pictures from a camera with an automatic trigger that he fastened to a tree in the Allegheny National Forest, about 115 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, hoping to photograph deer.

"We couldn't figure out what they were," Jacobs said of the images captured on Sept. 16. "I've been hunting for years and I've never seen anything like this."

He contacted the Bigfoot Research Organization, which pursues reports of a legendary two-legged creature that some people believe lives in parts of the U.S. and Canada.

"It appears to be a primate-like animal. In my opinion, it appears to be a juvenile Sasquatch," said Paul Majeta of the bigfoot group.

However, the Pennsylvania Game Commission has a more conventional opinion. Agency spokesman Jerry Feaser said conservation officers routinely trap bears to be tagged and often see animals that look like the photos.

"There is no question it is a bear with a severe case of mange," Feaser told The Bradford Era.

Associated Press Release